Analysis of Internal Auditor Characteristics on Quality Audit Considerations in Educational Institutions

Analysis of Internal Auditor Characteristics on Quality Audit Considerations in Educational Institutions

Authors
  • Caesar Bagus Pradana
    UPN
  • Helmy Wahyu Sukiswo
    UPN
Keywords
Internal Auditor, Audit Judgment, alternative educational institutions
Abstract

The quality of audit judgment is a key factor in supporting the effectiveness of Internal Quality Audits (IQA) and the governance of educational institutions. This study aims to analyze the influence of internal auditors’ characteristics on the quality of audit judgment in educational institutions. The study employs a qualitative approach using library research, specifically a review of scientific articles published between 2018 and 2023. The data were analyzed using content analysis to identify similarities, differences, and gaps in research findings regarding the characteristics of internal auditors and audit judgment. The results indicate that auditors’ experience and professional skepticism are the primary characteristics contributing to the quality of audit judgment. Experienced auditors with professional skepticism are able to evaluate evidence more critically, identify risks accurately, and produce objective and accountable audit recommendations.  However, the impact of these two characteristics may vary depending on contextual factors, such as task complexity, organizational pressure, and the quality of auditor training. This study concludes that strengthening internal auditors’ competencies, experience, and professional skepticism are key factors in improving the quality of audit judgment, thereby supporting accountability, transparency, and continuous quality improvement in educational institutions.

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82 (2), 261.

Alawiyah, Rieza Wardah, and Tituk Diah Widajantie. "Pengaruh Obedience Pressure, Independensi, Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Audit Judgment Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Wilayah Surabaya Timur." Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis 14.1 (2021): 68-80.

Amalia, P. N., Maidani, M., & Kuntadi, C. (2023). Pengaruh Kompetensi Auditor, Independensi Auditor dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor terhadap Pemberian Opini Audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(4), 428-434.

Andriansyah, A. (2021). Implementasi standar akuntansi sektor publik berdasarkan PP Nomor 20 Tahun 2015. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Publik, 6(2), 112-125.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

Chiquita Salsabila, A. (2022). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional dan independensi terhadap kualitas audit judgment. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Ekonomi, 17(1), 45-58.

Hartatik, S., Prasetyo, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2023). Digital transformation challenges in organizational management. Journal of Management and Business, 18(2), 145–158.

Lesnussa, Y. A., et al. (2023). The role of ICT in accelerating organizational digital transformation. International Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 33–45.

Nurlaila, Zuriatin, E., & Nurhasanah. (2024). Organizational readiness and digital skills in digital transformation. Journal of Human Resource Development, 9(1), 21–34.

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., et al. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), 223–250.

Wibowo, A., & Tomi, B. (2020). Information systems and data-driven decision making. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 16(2), 95–107.

Hendrawan & Dirmawan (2023): Mengenai peran auditor dalam kepatuhan standar dan pengambilan keputusan.

Hendrawan, A., & Dirmawan. (2023). Peran Auditor dalam Akuntabilitas Laporan dan Pengambilan Keputusan Strategis. Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Publik.

Hendrawan, A., & Dirmawan. (2023). Peran auditor internal dalam mematuhi standar pelaporan keuangan (FSA) untuk pengambilan keputusan manajemen. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 12(1), 89-104.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Maghfirah, A., & Yahya, M. (2018). Pengaruh pengalaman kerja dan kompetensi terhadap audit judgement pada kantor akuntan publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 3(2), 213-222.

Maghfirah, Indah & Yahya, M. R. 2018. Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas, Self-Efficacy, Dan Pengalaman Audit Terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Pada Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA) Vol. 3, No. 2. 276-288.

Monica, A. N. (2018). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Locus Of Control, Pengalaman Auditor dan Skeptisisme Profesional Terhadap Audit Judgement. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 23–30.

Mu’alifah (2018): Mengenai ketidaksignifikanan skeptisisme dalam kondisi tertentu (sebagai gap penelitian).

Mulyadi. (2019). Auditing: Konsep dan implementasi dalam profesi akuntan. Salemba Empat.

Pratiwi (2020) & Monica (2018): Mengenai pengaruh positif skeptisisme terhadap pertimbangan audit.

Pratiwi, N. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi audit judgement: Studi pada auditor pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi Berkelanjutan, 3(2), 156-170.

Pratiwi, W., & Pratiwi, D. N. (2020). Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Independensi Auditor, dan Skeptisme Profesional terhadap Audit Judgment. Current: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini, 1(2), 239-251.

Rahmadani, B., Sabrina, N., Handayani, M., Welly, W., & Ghazali, R. (2022). Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas Auditor, Kompetensi Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Perbankan Bumn Di Kota Palembang). Eqien-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 11(02), 283-291.

Raynaldi, R., & Afriyenti, M. (2020). Pengaruh Gender, Pengalaman, Keahlian, Situasi Audit dan Etika Terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 2(3), 3301-3311.

Rosyidi, U. (2020). Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan: Strategi dan Implementasi di Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. (Fokus pada pentingnya objektivitas auditor mutu).

Sarie, F., Sutaguna, I. N. T., Par, S. S., Par, M., Suiraoka, I. P., St, S., ... & Massenga, I. T. W. (2023). Metodelogi penelitian. Cendikia Mulia Mandiri.

Siwalima. (2021). Kasus Dugaan Korupsi Lahan PLTMG Namlea: Kesalahan Prosedur Audit BPKP. [Berita Terkait Malapraktik Audit].

Subiyanto, B., Digdowiseiso, K., & Mandasari, N. (2022). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional, Dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Pengungkapan Kecurangan (Fraud). Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(6), 2609-2620.

Sukiswo, H. W. (2024). How the auditor’s judgment made to achieve their goals?. ADPEBI International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.54099/aijbs.v4i2.1104

Sukiswo, Helmy, et al. "Analysis Issue And Challenge Of Cooperatives During Pandemic Era."

Suryana, Y. (2021). Manajemen Penjaminan Mutu Internal: Teori dan Praktik di Sekolah. Bandung: Alfabeta. (Fokus pada karakteristik dan kompetensi auditor pendidikan).

Susanto, E. E. (2020). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Independensi, Dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Dengan Pengalaman Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi pada BPK RI Perwakilan Kalimantan Timur) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Hasanuddin).

Sutrisno, E. (2023). Kualitas audit judgement dalam menanggapi informasi dokumentasi bukti. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 15(1), 10-22.

Sutrisno, E. (2023): Mengenai kualitas audit judgement sebagai indikator kinerja.

Tumurang, D. O., Ilat, V., & Kalalo, M. Y. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Audit Judgment Auditor Pada Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(3).

Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2012 / PP No. 4 Tahun 2014. Mengenai Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi (Sebagai landasan hukum audit mutu di Indonesia).

Wahyuni, W., Sudradjat, & Jasmadeti. (2020). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional dan pengalaman auditor terhadap audit judgement. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 15(2), 134-148.

Yowanda, V., Kristina, V., Pernando, R., Sherly, S., Erika, E., & Dinarianti, R. (2019). Pengaruh skeptisme, pengalaman auditor, dan self efficacy terhadap audit judgement pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah ESAI, 13(2), 124-140.

Yuliani, F., Agoes, S., & Indrajati, M. F. D. (2023). Skeptisisme Profesional Dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judgement Dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Kontemporer Akuntansi, 3(2), 59–68.

Zahra, R. S. A., & Ludigdo, U. (2021). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional dan kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit jarak jauh pada masa pandemi covid-19 pada kantor akuntan publik di surabaya (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).

Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Published
2025-12-31
How to Cite
Bagus Pradana, C., & Sukiswo, H. W. (2025). Analysis of Internal Auditor Characteristics on Quality Audit Considerations in Educational Institutions. JIEMAN: Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 7(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.35719/jieman.v7i2.286
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2025 Caesar Bagus Pradana, Helmy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.